Urania read from Wikipedia, “Elizabeth Bird, writing for the School Library Journal, described The Giving Tree as ‘one of the most divisive books in children’s literature’.” “Well,” said Calliope, “some think it’s a story of unconditional love.” “Some think it’s about environmental ethics,” said Thalia.
I first saw The Giving Tree in my mid 20’s or so. Then, I mostly saw an unrealistically generous “tree” that didn’t know how to say no. And a child who grew up thinking the “same” tree would always be there. And always asking for more.
Now, about half a century later, I see a different view entirely! The “tree” represents people who choose to contribute to the stream of life. Offering what they have that may be of value. The child is a symbolic recipient of those who give. As time passes the giver’s contributions dwindle as do we. As the recipient makes his way in life, he learns that getting isn’t all that life offers.
I first saw The Giving Tree in my mid 20’s or so. Then, I mostly saw an unrealistically generous “tree” that didn’t know how to say no. And a child who grew up thinking the “same” tree would always be there. And always asking for more.
Now, about half a century later, I see a different view entirely! The “tree” represents people who choose to contribute to the stream of life. Offering what they have that may be of value. The child is a symbolic recipient of those who give. As time passes the giver’s contributions dwindle as do we. As the recipient makes his way in life, he learns that getting isn’t all that life offers.
I am much confused by this book also. It made me sad when I read it. But indeed: I did think about it. And do still.
Weird book.
Good of you trying to find something beautiful in the face of weirdness.
Sign: “WHOEVER INVENTED ‘KNOCK-KNOCK’ JOKES SHOULD GET A NO-BELL PRIZE” 😁
Love the Churchill quote!